|Title:||A validation study of a Chinese version of the Swallow Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QOL) for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults|
|Subject:||Hong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertations|
Deglutition disorders -- Diagnosis
Quality of life -- Evaluation
|Department:||School of Nursing|
|Pages:||ix, 111,  leaves : ill. ; 30 cm.|
|Abstract:||Background: There is a growing concern to measure the effect of swallowing problems on the quality of life. However, clinical measurement in this aspect was unavailable in Hong Kong. Having the Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (SWAL- QOL) which was originally developed for the English-speaking population translated into Chinese and validated in Hong Kong would help to fill in the gap and serve the aforementioned purpose. Aims: To translate the SWAL- QOL into Chinese and to validate the Chinese Swallow Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CSWAL- QOL). Methods: A cross-cultural adaptation approach with five steps was used to translate the questionnaire from English into Chinese. With a convenience sampling, a cross-sectional survey was then launched to evaluate the validity and reliability of the CSWAL-QOL. One hundred subjects with swallowing problem were recruited to evaluate the construct validity and internal consistency and 20 subjects for the test-retest reliability. Construct validity was validated through factor analysis and a correlation study between the CSWAL-QOL and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire- an abbreviated version [WHOQOL-BREF (HK)]. Reliability was estimated using tests of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis of the CSWAL-QOL revealed a two-factor structure, namely the dysphagia-specific quality of life factor and the generic quality of life factor. This 2-factor model, similar to the model described by the original instrument, was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The correlation between the CSWAL-QOL scores and the WHOQOL-BREF (HK) scores was fair (rs = .387 - .705, p < .05). The internal consistency of the ten scales of the CSWAL-QOL was high, except for the eating desire scale α = .75 to .95, p < .05). The test-retest reliability as estimated by the Spearman's rho was fair (rs = .57, p < .05) while the intra-rater reliability estimated by the intraclass correlation index was good (ICC= .78, p < .05). The results of this study were grossly similar to those of the English version of the SWAL-QOL, except for the result of the eating desire scale and the communication scale which showed insignificant results in the construct validity. Conclusion: The validated CSWAL-QOL is a clinically valid and reliable tool for use to assess the quality of life in dysphagic Chinese patients in Hong Kong regardless of the causes of dysphagia|
|Rights:||All rights reserved|
Files in This Item:
|b22660173.pdf||For All Users (off-campus access for PolyU Staff & Students only)||2.17 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:
- I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
- I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
- I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.
By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: