|Author:||Ting, Hung Fion|
|Title:||Advance directives and life-sustaining treatment : attitudes of Hong Kong Chinese elders with chronic disease|
|Subject:||Hong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertations|
Chronically ill -- Psychological aspects -- China -- Hong Kong.
Older people -- China -- Hong Kong -- Psychology
|Department:||School of Nursing|
|Pages:||xiii, 126 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.|
|Abstract:||Background: The advances in medical technology and ageing population have led to increasing attention on the issues of end-of-life care. In Hong Kong, elders with chronic disease make up a large proportion in the healthcare system. This group of patient is more susceptible to mortality and mental incompetence. Advance directives and related issues are particularly relevant to them. However, there is little data on the attitudes of local elders with chronic disease on advance directives and life-sustaining treatment. With the increasing survival of elderly with chronic disease, there is a pressing need to explore their attitudes on that area. Aim: To examine the attitudes of Hong Kong Chinese elders with chronic disease with regard to advance directives and life-sustaining treatment. Design: A cross sectional survey was carried out in the in-patient medical wards of a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong. Advance directives and related concepts were explained to the participants before they were interviewed to ensure they had sufficient background information to give informed attitudes. Quantitative data regarding their attitudes towards the use of advance directives and life-sustaining treatment were collected. Results: A total of 219 elderly patients completed the survey. Their mean age was 73 (standard deviation, 8) years and 133 (60.7%) of them were female. The majority had neither heard about advance directives (81.3%) nor discussed the issue with others (72.6%) before participating in this study. After they were informed of the concept of advance directives, about half (49.3%) of them said they would consider using it if it had been legislated in Hong Kong. The respondents generally supported the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment in medically futile situations. 54.8% of them believed that the patient alone should make the decision on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment if competent to do so. If the patient was not competent, 43.8% believed that the patient's family alone should make the decision. However, despite having specific life-sustaining treatment preferences and strong support for the practice of limiting life-sustaining treatment using in medical futility situations, many of the respondents seldom thought (62.6%) or talked about these issues (72.6%) with other. Conclusion: The majority of the elderly patients in this study not only were able to take side rather than being undecided, they also showed a positive attitude towards the used of advance directives and limited use of life-sustaining treatment in medical futility situations. However, despite their open-mindedness, most of the respondents had never heard about advance directives or discussed the related issues with others. This points to a lack of knowledge and to the necessity to step up public education about advance directives and related issues.|
Files in This Item:
|b24122695.pdf||For All Users (off-campus access for PolyU Staff & Students only)||1.31 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:
- I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
- I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
- I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.
By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: