Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.contributor.advisorHo, Victor (ENGL)-
dc.creatorWang, Yihua-
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8095-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Polytechnic University-
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_US
dc.titleGender differences : use of hedges and boosts for persuasion in commencement speechesen_US
dcterms.abstractThis MA project investigates whether or not male and female speakers are different in the use of hedges and boosters to enhance credibility (ethos) in commencement speeches. It is a corpus-based study, which examines the persuasive function of hedges and boosters on lexical level. The corpus includes 40 commencement speeches (20 for each gender). Both quantitative and qualitative analysis have been conducted to explore the characteristic patterns of hedges and boosters as well as their contributions to the establishment of personal ethos. Results are compared to decide whether those characteristics are gender-specific. Findings reveal that modal verbs account for the largest proportion of hedging resources, while adverbs of frequency (e.g. always, never) are the most often used boosting device. The balance of hedges and boosters apprise audience of various certainties and demonstrate personal ethos of sincerity, confidence and trustworthiness. Meanwhile, it can be observed that male and female speeches share quantitative similarities, but they are different in persuasive styles and messages conveyed. Women{174}s use of hedges and boosters reflects a more affinitive and interpersonal communicative style, and they are more likely to convince the audience to be true to themselves and cherish special others.en_US
dcterms.extentv, 52 pages : illustrations (some color)en_US
dcterms.isPartOfPolyU Electronic Thesesen_US
dcterms.issued2015en_US
dcterms.educationalLevelAll Masteren_US
dcterms.educationalLevelM.A.en_US
dcterms.LCSHLanguage and languages -- Sex differences.en_US
dcterms.LCSHSpeeches, addresses, etc.en_US
dcterms.LCSHEnglish language -- Discourse analysisen_US
dcterms.LCSHHong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertationsen_US
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted accessen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
b28237304.pdfFor All Users (off-campus access for PolyU Staff & Students only)1.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Copyright Undertaking

As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:

  1. I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
  2. I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
  3. I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.

By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.

Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8095