Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Applied Social Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.advisorChen, Sylvia (APSS)-
dc.creatorWu, Chi Hang Wesley-
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8116-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Polytechnic University-
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_US
dc.titleDeveloping an integrative model of control : implications for psychological functioningen_US
dcterms.abstractThe development of control-related constructs have involved different approaches over time, and yet internal and external locus of control are conceptualized as dichotomous factors influencing active versus avoidant coping strategies. While external control is associated with avoidance, a similar belief construct fate control, which denotes that life events are pre-determined and influenced by external forces but predictable and alterable, challenges the assumption of incompatibility between fate and agency. It is hypothesized that external control predicts avoidant coping, which in turn predicts psychological distress. Fate control, in contrast, is hypothesized to predict both active and avoidant coping when dealing with stress. The model was confirmed using a cross-sectional approach in Study 1 (n = 251 university students) and hypothetical stressful scenarios in Study 2 (n = 294 university students). Furthermore, Study 2 identified perceived controllability as a moderator of such relationship, i.e. people high in fate control were more likely to use active coping in more controllable stressors but more likely to adopt avoidant coping in low controllable situations. The moderating effect was observed in self-reported coping behaviours using a diary approach in Study 3 (n = 188 university students and 102 community adults) and actual behaviours using an experimental design in Study 4 (n = 202 university students). Overall, this research has found discriminant validity of fate control and external control. By testing the dynamic theory of control, the findings offer an alternative perspective to the dichotomous view of control and provide implications for coping strategies and psychological health.en_US
dcterms.extent118 pages : illustrationsen_US
dcterms.isPartOfPolyU Electronic Thesesen_US
dcterms.issued2015en_US
dcterms.educationalLevelAll Doctorateen_US
dcterms.educationalLevelPh.D.en_US
dcterms.LCSHControl (Psychology)en_US
dcterms.LCSHLocus of controlen_US
dcterms.LCSHHong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertationsen_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
b28238102.pdfFor All Users752.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Copyright Undertaking

As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:

  1. I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
  2. I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
  3. I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.

By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.

Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8116