Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.contributor.advisorHo, Victor (ENGL)-
dc.creatorChan, Po Ling Pauline-
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8639-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Polytechnic University-
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_US
dc.titleEvaluative language in editor product reviews of search products vs experience productsen_US
dcterms.abstractWith the growth of online retailing business, the availability of product reviews has become an emerging market phenomenon that changes the landscape of communication. This kind of ubiquitous genre is believed to be playing an important role in consumer decision making process and the sales of products. There are generally two types of products: experience products, whose dominant attributes can only be accurately assessed after consumption, as opposed to search goods, whose dominant attributes can be evaluated prior to purchase. There is much research on the impact on consumer buying behavior, but only little research has been done to examine their evaluative language. In total, 100 online product editor reviews has been analyzed in this study by employing Appraisal theory. Electronic products are chosen as the representatives of search products while cosmetics are selected as the representatives of experience products. This study shows that both types of editors tend to include much evaluative language in their reviews and they like to make appreciation on products more than express their direct emotion or make judgment on people. Editors of experience products prefer to evaluate a little more than to the editors of search products by giving more appreciation on the quality of the goods than the search product reviews whereas search product reviewers make evaluation more on the value of the products. The results of the comparison can have important implications for discourse on different product types.en_US
dcterms.extentv, 93 pages : color illustrationsen_US
dcterms.isPartOfPolyU Electronic Thesesen_US
dcterms.issued2016en_US
dcterms.educationalLevelAll Masteren_US
dcterms.educationalLevelM.A.en_US
dcterms.LCSHConsumer goods -- Evaluation.en_US
dcterms.LCSHConsumer satisfaction -- Evaluation.en_US
dcterms.LCSHEnglish language -- Usage.en_US
dcterms.LCSHEvaluation -- Terminology.en_US
dcterms.LCSHHong Kong Polytechnic University -- Dissertationsen_US
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted accessen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
b29170722.pdfFor All Users (off-campus access for PolyU Staff & Students only)1.71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Copyright Undertaking

As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:

  1. I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
  2. I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
  3. I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.

By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.

Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/8639