Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorSchool of Hotel and Tourism Managementen_US
dc.contributor.advisorXiao, Honggen (SHTM)en_US
dc.creatorPang, Qingyun-
dc.identifier.urihttps://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/14389-
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserveden_US
dc.titleCo-creating a regenerative tourism future : exploring Chinese philosophical roots to build a community of practiceen_US
dcterms.abstractThis study examines regenerative tourism as an emerging paradigm in tourism development, particularly in the post-COVID context. In contrast to earlier models—such as neoliberal, alternative, and sustainable tourism—regenerative tourism extends beyond human-centred and economically driven frameworks, aiming to generate net-positive outcomes for both people and ecosystems. Despite its growing prominence, the concept remains underdeveloped, particularly with respect to theoretical clarity, the inclusion of non-Western perspectives, and empirical grounding.en_US
dcterms.abstractContemporary discourse on regenerative tourism is largely shaped by Western paradigms, often conflating it with concepts such as sustainability, transformation, or circularity. This conflation risks obscuring the distinctiveness of regenerative tourism as a paradigm in its own right. To address this limitation, the present study draws on Sheng Sheng (生生, perpetual growth and change), a Chinese philosophical framework centred on perpetual growth and transformation. Building on this foundation, the study proposes six core principles for regenerative tourism: (1) timeless regeneration, (2) organic self-generation, (3) harmony through polarity, (4) creative renewal, (5) the integration of creation and dissolution, and (6) ethical and equitable grounding.en_US
dcterms.abstractWhile some of these principles resonate with Western concepts—such as circular systems and place-based thinking—others, including the embrace of contradiction and the cyclical interplay of creation and decay, offer distinctively Eastern perspectives. Within this framework, regenerative tourism is reconceptualised as a dynamic, relational, and ethical process that fosters the co-evolution of human and non-human systems. It prioritises the balance of cultural and ecological tensions over attempts to control them and values Indigenous knowledge as complementary to external innovation.en_US
dcterms.abstractThis study critiques prevailing co-creation models in tourism for their pronounced anthropocentrism, which often marginalises the role of non-human elements. In response, it introduces a “community of practice” model, developed through fieldwork in Azheke village, China. This model incorporates both human and non-human actors into regenerative processes shaped by shared knowledge, seasonal rhythms, and local power dynamics. Within this framework, Indigenous elites act as boundary spanners, mediating between cultural heritage preservation and ecological sustainability.en_US
dcterms.abstractTwo initiatives in Azheke—the protective transformation of Hani dwellings and the Azheke Plan—are examined to illustrate how the philosophy of Sheng Sheng is enacted in practice. Each of the six principles is reflected in local regeneration efforts: regeneration as a continuous process; solutions emerging organically from within the community; the constructive engagement with tensions; innovation grounded in tradition; an acceptance of loss and transformation; and the ethical inclusion of all forms of life.en_US
dcterms.abstractTheoretically, this study contributes to the literature on regenerative tourism by clarifying its conceptual foundations and incorporating underrepresented Eastern philosophical perspectives. Practically, it proposes a framework for tourism development that is community-oriented, culturally sensitive, and ecologically inclusive. The research also underscores the value of resilience through adaptability, acknowledges the agency of non-human actors, and advances a more holistic understanding of well-being. Nonetheless, the study has certain limitations. It focuses primarily on a single strand of Eastern philosophy and examines a case that was not entirely community-led. Future research should engage with a wider range of Indigenous philosophical traditions and investigate initiatives that are more firmly rooted in bottom-up processes.en_US
dcterms.extentx, 179 pages : color illustrationsen_US
dcterms.isPartOfPolyU Electronic Thesesen_US
dcterms.issued2026en_US
dcterms.educationalLevelPh.D.en_US
dcterms.educationalLevelAll Doctorateen_US
dcterms.accessRightsopen accessen_US

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
8842.pdfFor All Users14.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Copyright Undertaking

As a bona fide Library user, I declare that:

  1. I will abide by the rules and legal ordinances governing copyright regarding the use of the Database.
  2. I will use the Database for the purpose of my research or private study only and not for circulation or further reproduction or any other purpose.
  3. I agree to indemnify and hold the University harmless from and against any loss, damage, cost, liability or expenses arising from copyright infringement or unauthorized usage.

By downloading any item(s) listed above, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the copyright undertaking as stated above, and agree to be bound by all of its terms.

Show simple item record

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/14389